Telemedicine for diabetes management during COVID-19: what we have learnt, what and how to implement.

The past two decades have witnessed telemedicine becoming a crucial part of health care as a method to facilitate doctor-patient interaction. Due to technological developments and the incremental acquisition of experience in its use, telemedicine's advantages and cost-effectiveness has led to it being recognised as specifically relevant to diabetology. However, the pandemic created new challenges for healthcare systems and the rate of development of digital services started to grow exponentially. It was soon discovered that COVID-19-infected patients with diabetes had an increased risk of both mortality and debilitating sequelae. In addition, it was observed that this higher risk could be attenuated primarily by maintaining optimal control of the patient's glucose metabolism. As opportunities for actual physical doctor-patient visits became restricted, telemedicine provided the most convenient opportunity to communicate with patients and maintain delivery of care. The wide range of experiences of health care provision during the pandemic has led to the development of several excellent strategies regarding the applicability of telemedicine across the whole spectrum of diabetes care. The continuation of these strategies is likely to benefit clinical practice even after the pandemic crisis is over.

Combining diabetes and mental health care: An ethnographic exploration of user involvement in combined care.

PURPOSE: To explore and describe the enactment of user involvement and combined care in a Danish clinic that aimed at providing integrated diabetes and mental health care. DESIGN: An ethnographic study. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Data consisted of field notes from 96 hours of participant observations and field notes from 32 informal conversations with healthcare providers, users and relatives as well as 12 semistructured interviews with users. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis. This study reports to the SRQR guidelines. RESULTS: Treatment was not combined as intended if only one healthcare provider handled the consultations. Here, the healthcare providers' focus was often on their own area of expertise-either mental health or diabetes. If more than one healthcare provider handled consultations, the consultations were often divided between them, focussing on one condition at the time. Healthcare providers noted, that learning from peer colleagues was a way to increase the possibility for combined care. Furthermore, combined care was highly dependent on the healthcare providers' ability to involve users' illness experiences in their own care planning. Here, a high level of user involvement increased the levels of combined care during consultations. CONCLUSION: This study set out to explore and describe user involvement and combined care in a specialised diabetes and mental health outpatient clinic. Combined care is complexed and requires that healthcare providers are well-equipped to manage the complexity of delivering care for people with both conditions. The degree of combined care was linked with the healthcare providers' ability to involve users and their knowledge on the condition outside there are of expertise. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A peer-learning environment in combination with clinical guidelines and joint display could support healthcare providers in involving users in own care and when delivering care outside their area of expertise. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the original user council withdraw their consent to participate due to health-related worries and anxiety concerning the pandemic. The user council consisted of three members diagnosed with diabetes and severe mental illness. They were invited to participate in physical meetings, phone or online meetings. Presenting findings from the study to the study participants were also hindered by the second lockdown. This influenced the possibility for data triangulation.

Piloting a new compensation model for endocrinologists to improve diabetes care

There is a consensus that fee-for-service reimbursement does too little to encourage the provision of high-value care. Our Enterprise, an integrated payer-provider based in Pittsburgh, created an alternative compensation model for endocrinologists. Our plan introduces a gradual shift in the role of endocrinologists from clinical duties to a more collaborative role with their primary care colleagues. Considering that most patients with diabetes are managed under primary care, this shift allows endocrinologists to support primary care physicians (PCPs) in managing patients with diabetes and other endocrine-related illnesses while decreasing the number of traditional in-office referrals to endocrinology. Despite the unexpected changes brought on by COVID, in first 9 months of the compensation model, we observed its impact on care delivery as well as the relationship between participating specialists and PCPs. Practice- and provider-level quality data has shown improvement in diabetes-specific quality metrics. In one year, 16 out of 54 target practices earned NCQA recognition for diabetes management. A total of 88% of participating PCPs reported a satisfaction score > 90% with the new plan. Ultimately, our model shows promise as a replacement for fee-for-service compensation, with a likelihood of lowering costs and improved quality of care.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s)

The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes care indices in Southern Iran: an interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires a continues bulk of cares. It is very probable COVID-19 pandemic is affected its healthcare coverage. METHODS: The interrupted time series analysis is used to model the trend of diabetes healthcare indices, such as the health worker visits, physician visits, body mass index (MBI), fasting blood sugar (FBS), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), before and after the start of COVID-19 pandemic. The reference of data was the totals of all T2DM patients living in Fars Province, Southern Iran, areas covered by Shiraz University of Medical Science (SUMS), from 2019 to 2020. RESULTS: A significant decrease for visits by the health workers, and physicians was observed by starting COVID-19 pandemic (ß2 = -0.808, P < 0.001, ß2 = -0.560, P < 0.001); Nevertheless, the coverage of these services statistically increased by next months (ß3 = 0.112, P < 0.001, ß3 = 0.053, P < 0.001). A same pattern was observed for the number of BMI, FBS and HbA1c assessments, and number of refer to hospital emergency wards (ß3 = 0.105, P < 0.001; ß3 = 0.076, P < 0.001; ß3 = 0.022, P < 0.001; ß3 = 0.106, P < 0.001). The proportion of T2DM patients with HbA1C < 7%, and controlled hypertension during study period was statistically unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: When the COVID-19 pandemic was announced, T2DM healthcare coverage drastically decreased, but it quickly began to rebound. The health monitoring system could not have any noticeable effects on diabetes outcomes.

Improving diabetes care in Ealing, London: an analysis of the NDA and diabetes‐related admissions data during first year of COVID‐19

In this paper, we present and analyse National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and diabetes‐related emergency admissions data in Ealing during the period 1 January 2020 to 31 March 2021. Care for diabetes and other long‐term conditions was disrupted and significantly impacted during this initial period of the COVID‐19 pandemic.The NDA analysis shows that for type 1 and type 2 diabetes Key Care Processes (KCPs), both the eight and nine KCPs fell between 2019/20 and 2020/21, but the relative fall for NHS Ealing was lower than that seen for England. Type 1 diabetes Three Treatment Targets (3TTs) for NHS Ealing increased from 22.6% in 2019/20 to 26.4% in 2020/21;in contrast the 3TTs for England increased slightly from 19.8% in 2019/20 to 20.8% in 2020/21. Type 2 diabetes 3TTs for NHS Ealing changed from 40.9% in 2019/20 to 38.9% in 2020/21, while in England it was 40.3% in 2019/20 and 35.5% in 2020/21.The diabetes‐related emergency admissions analysis shows that there were reductions in the number and rate of emergency admissions for cerebrovascular accident and myocardial infarction;admissions and rates for diabetic ketoacidosis and amputations were the same;those for diabetes mellitus and hypoglycaemia increased. There were overall cost savings of £874,147 due to estimated avoided admissions.In Ealing, the NDA data, diabetes‐related emergency admissions and estimated avoided admissions data show that improvements in diabetes care achieved in previous years in Ealing, faltered, but were broadly sustained in the first pandemic year. Support from the Ealing diabetes care teams, improved self‐management of diabetes and the empowering of people with diabetes through digital technologies could explain these trends in Ealing. Continued access to health care practitioners during the COVID‐19 pandemic is important to ensure the appropriate management of long‐term conditions such as type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons.

Disparities in routine healthcare utilization disruptions during COVID-19 pandemic among veterans with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: While emerging studies suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic caused disruptions in routine healthcare utilization, the full impact of the pandemic on healthcare utilization among diverse group of patients with type 2 diabetes is unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine trends in healthcare utilization, including in-person and telehealth visits, among U.S. veterans with type 2 diabetes before, during and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, by demographics, pre-pandemic glycemic control, and geographic region. METHODS: We longitudinally examined healthcare utilization in a large national cohort of veterans with new diabetes diagnoses between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018. The analytic sample was 733,006 veterans with recently-diagnosed diabetes, at least 1 encounter with veterans administration between March 2018-2020, and followed through March 2021. Monthly rates of glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements, in-person and telehealth outpatient visits, and prescription fills for diabetes and hypertension medications were compared before and after March 2020 using interrupted time-series design. Log-linear regression model was used for statistical analysis. Secular trends were modeled with penalized cubic splines. RESULTS: In the initial 3 months after the pandemic onset, we observed large reductions in monthly rates of HbA1c measurements, from 130 (95%CI,110-140) to 50 (95%CI,30-80) per 1000 veterans, and in-person outpatient visits, from 1830 (95%CI,1640-2040) to 810 (95%CI,710-930) per 1000 veterans. However, monthly rates of telehealth visits doubled between March 2020-2021 from 330 (95%CI,310-350) to 770 (95%CI,720-820) per 1000 veterans. This pattern of increases in telehealth utilization varied by community type, with lowest increase in rural areas, and by race/ethnicity, with highest increase among non-hispanic Black veterans. Combined in-person and telehealth outpatient visits rebounded to pre-pandemic levels after 3 months. Despite notable changes in HbA1c measurements and visits during that initial window, we observed no changes in prescription fills rates. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilization among veterans with diabetes was substantially disrupted at the onset of the pandemic, but rebounded after 3 months. There was disparity in uptake of telehealth visits by geography and race/ethnicity.

Impact of Japan's State of Emergency Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Trends in Diabetes Care: A Descriptive and Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of Japan's state of emergency on trends in diabetes care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. DESIGN: A descriptive and retrospective study. SETTING: Showa University Hospital, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with diabetes who received medical treatment from 2018 to 2020. Determinants of interest: Number of patients with diabetes visiting the hospital per week. To examine the impact of the Japan's state of emergency, the number of hospital visitations by patients with diabetes was summarized from 28 weeks of data for each year, from calendar week 8 to calender week 35. RESULTS: Compared with the mean of 2018 and 2019, no significant difference was found between the three periods (before, during, and after the state of emergency). However, the numbers of patients from both inside and outside Tokyo increased at 7 weeks after the state of emergency was lifted. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in the numbers of patients with diabetes was seen compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019, suggesting that the state of emergency may have hindered diabetes care. Therefore, patients with diabetes should receive continuous follow-up regarding their diabetes care, keeping a close eye on relvent measurements.

Factors Influencing the Desirability, Acceptability, and Adherence of Patients with Diabetes to Telemedicine.

Background and Objectives: Telemedicine solutions have proven their value and efficacy in augmenting diabetes care. In addition to the availability of tools needed to implement telemedicine solutions for patients with diabetes, the patients' desirability, acceptance, and adherence represent major burdens in implementing them. The main aim of this research is to evaluate which factors are influencing the desirability, acceptance, and adherence of patients with diabetes to telemedicine interventions in diabetes care. Materials and Methods: QTelemeDiab, a previously validated instrument for assessing patients' desirability, acceptance, and adherence to telemedicine in diabetes care, was used on 114 enrolled patients with diabetes mellitus, in parallel with demographic, socio-economic, disease history, and psychometric data from all patients. Results: Left-skewed score distributions were observed for the QTelemeDiab total score (median = 166; skewness = -1.738), as well as all its components, thus denoting a high desirability, acceptance, and adherence towards telemedicine use. The presence of severe depression was associated with significant decreases in the QTelemeDiab score (148 vs. 167; p < 0.001), as well as on the desirability sub-score (101 vs. 115; p < 0.001) and adherence sub-score (30 vs. 35; p < 0.001). The presence of severe anxiety was associated with significant decreases in QTelemeDiab score (150 vs. 166), as well as the desirability sub-score (104 vs. 114; p = 0.008) and adherence sub-score (30 vs. 34; p = 0.012). Conclusions: There is a high desirability, acceptance, and adherence to the use of telemedicine interventions in patients with diabetes, both in special and in normal epidemiological settings. The presence of severe anxiety decreases the patient's desirability, acceptance, and adherence, while the presence of severe depression decreases the patient's desirability and adherence to the use of telemedicine interventions in diabetes care.

Lebenssituation und Versorgung von Menschen mit Diabetes mellitus: Ein Scoping Review zu den Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland

The present study gives an overview on the effects caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the living and care situation of people with diabetes in Germany. For this purpose, a systematic search was conducted using the scoping review methodology. On the one hand, a systematic literature search was accomplished in scientific databases for empirical studies and in other search areas for other non-empirical publications. On the other hand, routinely collected electronic health data (routine data;e.g., health insurers' administrative data, data from patient registers, medical billing, and drug care data from contractual physicians) were requested from health insurance companies, patient registries or other institutions to gain insight into the care situation of people with diabetes. The literature search identified a total of 53 publications (12 empirical studies and 41 other publications) which were included in the data extraction. Additionally, the methodological quality of the empirical studies was assessed. Due to the small number of empirical studies and their low methodological quality, the evidence gaps regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care of people with diabetes are large. However, the empirical studies provide little evidence that the pandemic had a negative impact on the use of diabetes-specific services. The studies show fewer new and re-enrolments in disease management programs for diabetes;fewer changes in prescriptions of blood glucose-lowering drugs;fewer diabetes diagnoses and a higher rate of diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the use of digital tools for the care of people with diabetes. The search for routine data remained without results. In summary, very limited reliable data on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of people with diabetes in Germany was available.

Improving glycaemic management in people with diabetes on maintenance haemodialysis

The Diabetes Care in Haemodialysis (DiH) working group aims to improve the care of people with diabetes mellitus on the haemodialysis unit by supporting the implementation of the 2016 JBDS guidelines. In order to support the implementation of the guideline recommendations the DiH working group have established a set of standards, developed an audit tool to demonstrate adherence to standards, and have developed educational support for haemodialysis staff both online and delivered face-to-face. We publish audit findings from five distinct haemodialysis units, highlighting the impact of the educational programme on the achievement of guideline standards. We also report the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes care and quality improvement.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetes Care for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health prevention measures have led to a disruption of the delivery of routine care and may have had an impact on the quality of diabetes care. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the extent to which structure, process and outcome quality measures in diabetes care changed in the first 6 months of the pandemic compared with previous periods. METHODS: A before-and-after observational study of all community-living Ontario residents >20 years of age and living with diabetes. The patients were divided into 3 cohorts: a pandemic cohort, alive March to September 2020 (n=1,393,404); reference cohort 1, alive March to September 2019 (n=1,415,490); and reference cohort 2, alive September 2019 to February 2020 (n=1,444,000). Outcome measures were in-person/virtual visits to general practitioners and specialists, eye examinations, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) testing, filled prescriptions, and admissions to emergency departments (EDs) and hospitals for acute and chronic diabetes complications. RESULTS: The probability of an in-person visit to a GP decreasing by 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47% to 47%) in the pandemic period compared with both previous periods. The probability of having an eye exam was lower by 43% (95% CI, 44% to 43%), an A1C test by 28% (95% CI, 29% to 28%) and an LDL test by 31% (95% CI, 31% to 31%) in the pandemic period compared with the same 6-month period the year before. There were very small decreases in drug prescriptions and decreases of 18% and 16% in ED and hospital visits for complications. CONCLUSIONS: We observed disruptions to both structure and processes measures of diabetes care in Ontario during the first wave of the pandemic.

Predictors of Clinical Inertia and Type 2 Diabetes: Assessment of Primary Care Physicians and Their Patients.

With the growing prevalence and complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, many patients fail to achieve treatment goals despite guidelines and possibilities for treatment individualization. One of the identified root causes of this failure is clinical inertia. We explored this phenomenon, its possible predictors, and groups of patients affected the most, together with offering potential paths for intervention. Our research was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2021 involving 52 physicians and 543 patients of primary healthcare institutions in Belgrade, Serbia. The research instruments were questionnaires based on similar studies, used to collect information related to the factors that contribute to developing clinical inertia originating in both physicians and patients. In 224 patients (41.3%), clinical inertia was identified in patients with poor overall health condition, long diabetes duration, and comorbidities. Studying the changes made to the treatment, most patients (53%) had their treatment adjustment more than a year ago, with 19.3% of patients changing over the previous six months. Moreover, we found significant inertia in the treatment of patients using modern insulin analogues. Referral to secondary healthcare institutions reduced the emergence of inertia. This assessment of primary care physicians and their patients pointed to the high presence of clinical inertia, with an overall health condition, comorbidities, diabetes duration, current treatment, last treatment change, glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting glucose measuring frequency, BMI, patient referral, diet adjustment, and physician education being significant predictors.

Piloting a New Compensation Model for Endocrinologists to Improve Diabetes Care

There is a consensus that fee-for-service reimbursement does too little to encourage the provision of high-value care. Our Enterprise, an integrated payer-provider based in Pittsburgh, created an alternative compensation model for endocrinologists. Our plan introduces a gradual shift in the role of endocrinologists from clinical duties to a more collaborative role with their primary care colleagues. Considering that most patients with diabetes are managed under primary care, this shift allows endocrinologists to support primary care physicians (PCPs) in managing patients with diabetes and other endocrine-related illnesses while decreasing the number of traditional in-office referrals to endocrinology. Despite the unexpected changes brought on by COVID, in first 9 months of the compensation model, we observed its impact on care delivery as well as the relationship between participating specialists and PCPs. Practice- and provider-level quality data has shown improvement in diabetes-specific quality metrics. In one year, 16 out of 54 target practices earned NCQA recognition for diabetes management. A total of 88% of participating PCPs reported a satisfaction score > 90% with the new plan. Ultimately, our model shows promise as a replacement for fee-for-service compensation, with a likelihood of lowering costs and improved quality of care.

The imperious need for telemedicine for the care of diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive approach study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with diabetes experience difficulties to maintain glycemic control during the confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the risk of developing diabetes chronic complications and severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the conversion of an outpatient diabetes primary care center from a face-to-face care modality to a telemedicine care service by telephone. METHODS: Medical consultations were made by telephone during the initial phase of confinement (April to June 2020), to then continue the follow-up of patients admitted to a multicomponent diabetes care program. RESULTS: A total of 1,118 consultations were made by telephone and follow-up was subsequently continued in 192 patients with type 2 diabetes. Different professionals from different health areas participated, including medical care, diabetes education, nutrition, psychology and podiatry. CONCLUSIONS: Multicomponent diabetes care was successfully transformed from a face-to-face care modality to a telemedicine service. Many primary care patients may be candidates for telemedicine. A redesign of the care model that incorporates telemedicine should be considered to mitigate chronic diseases burden of morbidity and mortality imposed by COVID-19 pandemic, but also for the post-COVID-19 era.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los pacientes con diabetes experimentan dificultades para mantener el control glucémico durante el confinamiento por la pandemia de COVID-19, con el riesgo de presentar complicaciones crónicas de la diabetes y COVID-19 grave. OBJETIVO: El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la conversión de un centro de atención primaria presencial de diabetes a un servicio de telemedicina por llamada telefónica. MÉTODOS: Se realizaron consultas médicas por llamada telefónica durante la etapa inicial del confinamiento (abril a junio de 2020), para continuar el seguimiento de pacientes ingresados a un programa de atención multicomponente en diabetes. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 1118 consultas por llamada telefónica para continuar el seguimiento de 192 pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. Participaron diferentes profesionales de distintas áreas de la salud: atención médica, educación en diabetes, nutrición, psicología y podología. CONCLUSIONES: La atención multicomponente en diabetes se transformó con éxito de un esquema de atención presencial a un servicio de telemedicina. Numerosos pacientes de atención primaria pueden ser candidatos a telemedicina. Se debe considerar un rediseño del modelo de atención que incorpore la telemedicina para mitigar la carga de morbimortalidad en enfermedades crónicas impuesta por la pandemia de COVID-19, pero también para la era pos-COVID-19.

Integrated Care Management to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Refugee and Immigrant Patients (I-Care).

Purpose: Refugee and immigrant patients face significant barriers to health care and are more likely to have poorly controlled chronic disease than the general U.S. population. I-Care aims to improve health equity for refugees and immigrants who face a disproportionate burden of chronic disease. Methods: Refugees and immigrants with uncontrolled diabetes and associated cardiovascular risk factors were enrolled in a care management program within an academic adult medicine clinic. The program utilized a care manager to coordinate care and services between designated primary care providers, affiliated clinical teams, and community partners. Health literacy, chronic disease parameters, and care utilization were assessed at enrollment and 8-12 months later. Results: A total of 50 refugees and immigrants were followed for 8 to 12 months. Clinical parameters found a reduced mean HbA1c from 9.32 to 8.60 (p=0.05) and reduced low-density lipoprotein mean from 96.22 to 86.60 (p=0.01). The frequency of normal blood pressures was 9 (18%) at enrollment and 16 (32%) at 1 year. The cumulative frequency of emergency room visits decreased from 66% to 36% and hospitalizations from 22% to 8%. Rates of comprehensive care monitoring, including monofilament testing and one-time ophthalmology visits, increased from 60% to 82% and from 32% to 42%, respectively. Cumulative frequency of interdisciplinary support engagement with pharmacy and nutrition visits increased from 58% to 78% and from 26% to 38%, respectively. Conclusion: This program highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary community-engaged care model that has demonstrated improvement in quality metrics and health care costs for refugees and immigrants.

Effect of Lockdown on Diabetes Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Result of a Telephone-Based Survey Among Patients Attending a Diabetic Clinic in Northern India.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has aggravated the demand for diabetes care due to restrictive measures like the lockdown affecting access to healthcare services. The current study was conducted to assess the changes in medication compliance, dietary pattern, and glucose monitoring during the lockdown period as compared to the pre-lockdown period among patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attending a diabetes clinic in northern India. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted between May and July 2020. Information regarding the sociodemographic and clinical profiles of the patients like age, sex, income, qualification, family history of diabetes, history of smoking and alcohol, type of treatment, co-morbidities, drug adherence for T2DM, changes in the pattern of diet, physical activity, blood glucose monitoring, and drug usage during and before the lockdown was collected through telephonic interviews using a structured tool. Descriptive analysis was performed, and the chi-square and Wilcoxon sign ranks tests were used to see the association between variables. Results A total of 260 patients were enrolled in the study. A higher proportion of males reported a decrease in the consumption of cereals (13.9%), eggs (56.5%), and meat and fish (92.7%) and an increase in water intake (25.8%) while a higher proportion of females reported no change in physical activity levels (77.2%) during the lockdown against pre-COVID times. There was a significant improvement in medication adherence and glycemic control during the lockdown period as compared to the pre-lockdown times. Conclusion More time for self-care, adequate counseling about glycemic goals, and knowledge of self-monitoring of blood glucose levels helped the majority of patients in adopting a healthy lifestyle and achieve better glycemic control during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Emotional burden and care of adults with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian regions.

AIMS: This study investigated the emotional burden in persons with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian regions and evaluated which COVID-19, sociodemographic/clinical characteristics are related to it. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, T1D adults completed a web-based survey from May to July 2020. We collected sociodemographic/clinical data, and participants answered COVID-19 related questions. Diabetes burnout was evaluated by Diabetes burnout scale. Type 1 Diabetes scale assessed Diabetes Distress and PHQ-8 measured depressive symptoms. RESULTS: DD and DS levels were similar in all Brazilian regions. DB was higher in Central-West/North/Northeast. Higher DB was associated with females, lower-income, higher HbA1c, and shorter time since T1D diagnosis. Predictors of experiencing higher levels of DD included: difficulty access to safe places to exercise, participants without a partner, male gender, young age, and higher HbA1c. Higher depressive symptoms were associated with difficulty to access diabetes supplies, and higher HbA1c (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The mean levels of DB, DD, and DS were high in all Brazilian regions. A great number of PWT1D had their diabetes care impaired and relied on family as their main support during the pandemic. The subgroups identified at risk should be prioritized in mental health support.

Alphabet strategy for diabetes care: A checklist approach in the time of COVID-19 and beyond.

Chronic disease management requires achievement of critical individualised targets to mitigate again long-term morbidity and premature mortality associated with diabetes mellitus. The responsibility for this lies with both the patient and health care professionals. Care plans have been introduced in many healthcare settings to provide a patient-centred approach that is both evidence-based to deliver positive clinical outcomes and allow individualised care. The Alphabet strategy (AS) for diabetes is based around such a care plan and has been evidenced to deliver high clinical standards in both well-resourced and under-resourced settings. Additional patient educational resources include special care plans for those people with diabetes undertaking fasting during Ramadan, Preconception Care, Prevention and Remission of Diabetes. The Strategy and Care Plan has facilitated evidence-based, cost-efficient multifactorial intervention with an improvement in the National Diabetes Audit targets for blood pressure, cholesterol levels and glycated haemoglobin. Many of these attainments were of the standard seen in intensively treated cohorts of key randomized controlled trials in diabetes care such as the Steno-2 and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. This is despite working in a relatively under-resourced service within the United Kingdom National Health Service. The AS for diabetes care is a useful tool to consider for planning care, education of people with diabetes and healthcare professional. During the time of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic the risk factors for the increased mortality observed have to be addressed aggressively. The AS has the potential to help with this aspiration.

Self- management of diabetes mellitus during the Covid-19 pandemic: Recommendations for a resource limited setting.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged both institutional and self-management of diabetes. The ongoing social distancing and lock downs have negatively impacted to access to care and self-management. METHODS: This is a narrative review of diabetes management in a resource limited setting during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic databases, namely; Pubmed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched for literature. Search terms were "corona virus", "COVID-19", "diabetes self-care", "diabetes self-management education", "DSME", "diabetes self-management", "diabetes self-care in low income countries" and "diabetes management in Zimbabwe". RESULTS: This paper suggests a culturally tailored educational plan on diabetes self-management of diabetes in a limited resource country, Zimbabwe, amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Components of health education comprised general preventive measures, medications, diet, physical activity, self-monitoring of blood glucose, stress management, foot care, smoking and drinking and preventing complications of diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: We have reemphasized the need for self-care, social support and a collaborative, patient-centered approach to care amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.